Rock Chalk...What The Hawk?The University of Kansas Athletics Department had some serious ‘splainin to do following Snoop Dogg’s performance at Allen Fieldhouse. News of the fiasco quickly spiraled as the rapper’s performance featured profanity (surprisingly, no weed), pole dancers -- or acrobatic performers as they’re apparently called now -- and money guns. With the department already under fire for NCAA violations, you can bet they’re in full crisis management mode right now. Rock Chalk... what the hawk? We’ve yet to hear a serious explanation surrounding their choice of artist for the event and, quite frankly, it doesn’t matter much at this point; but they did release a statement saying that they “expected a clean version of the show.” Here are four magical insights (risk management tips, rather) from #Kelseydh that brands can use to avoid this kind of trouble in the future. Don't expect that anyone is willing to switch up for youI can’t call it for sure but it seems that the Jayhawk brand just wanted to create a show that was culturally relevant and generated buzz but, if family-friendly was the mission, Snoop wasn’t the right choice. A lot of college athletics departments operate separately from the overall university, but the idea that a lot of people miss is that, for fans, it all goes together -- KU is KU, Jayhawks...KU. Still, individual brands or not, they should have chosen an artist that aligned with the overall brand and values of the university. Snoop Dogg’s brand doesn’t equate to family-friendly and the rapper should not have been expected to do anything different from what has made him a fortune to meet the needs of a university athletics department. Keep in mind that when you’re looking to partner with a public figure or another brand, the first question you should ask is “which artist/brand appeals to our audience and aligns with our mission and core values?” Everything should point back to mission and values. If it’s not a fit, don’t risk it. Walk throughs and rehearsals will serve you wellWhile vetting the artist and what they stand for should have happened in step one, it’s almost always a better idea to run through your events so that you have an idea of what is happening, how, when and who is doing what. The team missed a key opportunity to remind Snoop to a) clean up his performance and b) fix any other issues they might find problematic like money guns, for example, or... poles center court. And, friends, if you honestly aren’t too sure, ask your PR team to come along. I’m sure we’ll find a couple of things to correct so we can attract the right kind of press. Plan for every scenario and every responseAnticipating a classic Snoop performance, for those aware, would’ve been number one on the list of concerns for a family-friendly event. For those not as aware, they trusted the rapper’s management team to ensure he came through with a clean performance. Big mistake. My advice for situations like this is to anticipate every crisis or issue and create a plan for how you’ll address it. You may use it and you may not, but at least you’re prepared to handle crap if it hits the fan. Things to plan for could’ve included profanity, negative response from stakeholders regarding artist choice, sound issues, capacity and crowd control to name a few things. I don’t think anyone could’ve anticipated pole dancers and money guns but, again, they could’ve prevented that if they had ran through the show beforehand or simply asked about the artist’s plans for the performance. Bonus tip? Any special requests or agreements — in this case, a clean show because it’s not his normal routine — are best agreed upon contractually. Safe partnerships for the rest of 2019 and beyond. #protectyourbrand #saveyourbutt There's such a thing as too riskyWe’ve discussed brands taking risks before haven’t we? Oh I think so - in our Diversity in Marketing talk! This one is a little different, though. Rather than risking it for the sake of social justice like the ones we talked about in Diversity in Marketing, KU risked it all for the sake of...well we don’t know for sure but my guess is buzz. With other NCAA allegations against them, this by no stretch of the imagination was the right move. Again, talk your ideas through with legal or PR so they can steer you in the right direction. One of the best times to play it safe is when you’re already in hot water. Tend to the fires already burning before causing another one. Thoroughly brainstorm and sort through all of your ideas -- how will this work, what do I want out of this, how do I want my audience to respond, what will it cost me and can I afford it -- then cautiously determine which ones are the best and which ones aren’t. There’s no benefit in taking unnecessary risks. We’ve all made mistakes. They’ve not all gone viral but maybe they’ve been just as controversial or... maybe not. These are transferable lessons you can use to do some preliminary risk management before launching a new campaign or planning an event. It’s not looking good for KU and it’s not fun dealing with a flood of negative media attention. Here’s hoping they’re able to make a come back after this one.
0 Comments
Plus action steps you can take to diversify your team“We sincerely apologize to the Native American community for the insensitivity of our newest campaign. Though it is never our intention to offend or make light of any culture or race of people, we realize that we did not consider the implications of (insert problematic act). Going forward we will seek to have more diversity and inclusion on our team so to avoid these mishaps in the future…” or something like that, right? We’ve read the statements time after time that brands repeatedly release after pushing out problematic products and campaigns. Then they almost always follow up with an announcement that they’ve hired a new “VP of Diversity and Inclusion,” whose job it is to hire more underrepresented minorities and migrate them into company culture. Diversity and inclusion should not be an afterthought or hail Mary, they are not safety precautions and they are not buzz words -- they’re conscious efforts. Diversity and inclusion ensures the varied perspectives of underrepresented groups are in the room and at the table. Let’s learn from five examples explicitly showing us why inclusion is an urgency. Dior SauvageThe French brand pushed out a campaign featuring a Native American dressed in traditional regalia to market their newest fragrance. Why is this problematic? American history includes traumatic patterns of racism dating all the way back to the “discovery” of The New Land. The indigenous people who originally lived on what is now American soil were nearly wiped out due to the white supremacy of European colonizers who saw them as savages. They took away their land, their way of life and pushed what is left of the culture and its people into reservations. So to feature a Native American person in an ad for a fragrance named Sauvage is extremely insensitive. H&M's monkey shirtH&M was in hot water after using a young Black boy to model its "coolest monkey in the jungle" sweatshirt. Why is this problematic? Of the many derogatory terms used to describe Black people, one of them is “monkey.” Racists compared our strong features to that of apes. Putting a young Black boy in a monkey shirt, while not intentional, has the opposite effect than that of “aw how cute!” A-list celebrities vowed to never support the brand again -- Lebron James, The Weekend (who, at one point in time, was a brand ambassador) -- as well as everyday people like ourselves. As a result, the company took a hit in both sales and brand identity. Gucci's Black-face sweaterThe high-fashion brand took to social media to advertise their Balaclava knit top that, coincidentally, looked a lot like blackface when the model pulled the neck of the shirt up over her mouth. It was classic, undeniable blackface -- black, thick red lips... you know, the same as we saw in the satirical cartoons, acted out by non-Black actors in dramatic makeup, in an effort to poke fun at Blacks. Additionally, this is problematic because those same cartoons intended to visualize stereotypes of us. And while normal middle-class families aren’t the fashion house’s target audience, celebrities took to their social accounts to call for a complete boycott of the brand. Following an uproar of backlash, the company released the following statement, “We are fully committed to increasing diversity throughout our organization and turning this incident into a powerful learning moment for the Gucci team and beyond." Gucci later announced the hire of a new diversity executive. Dolce & Gabanna's Instagram adChinese retailers pulled Dolce & Gabbana off the shelves after culturally inaccurate ad videos showed a Chinese woman eating Italian food with...chopsticks? Yes, chopsticks; and to make matters worse, several screenshots surfaced of the fashion house’s Instagram account where cruel language -- allegedly posted by hackers -- was used in reference to the country and in defense of the videos. Why is this problematic? The videos were seen as racist and they featured outdated stereotypes of Chinese people. According to the CBC, the brand was forced to cancel a major extravaganza that the company dubbed one of its largest shows outside of Italy. The two designers resolutely issued a video apology following the entire fiasco. Gillette's "Toxic Masculinity" adThe shaving brand tried its hand at taking a stand against toxic masculinity. The brand aimed to show men how they could take a stand against inappropriate behaviors, using the tagline “the best a man can be” -- a switch up from its “the best a man can get” campaign. The problem is the ad upset a lot of men, many of whom were longtime customers of Gillette. Some called it “feminist propaganda” in regard to the way the video depicted men. At the height of the #metoo movement, we can kind of see the statement they were trying to make, but the way they went about it alienated their primary target audience. As more brands aim to be politically responsive, many walking the fine line often fall off the deep end in by coming close but no cigar in how they use their creativity to demonstrate their stance. It would’ve been easy for the company to simply say they stand with women everywhere who have been victims of sexual assault without throwing all men completely under the bus. But the video, while a likely expensive attempt, did not say that. Pictures are worth 1,000 words. How do we fix it?We preach this mantra all the time: wE NeEd DiVersItY aNd IcLUsIoN IN MaRkEtInG! However, we’re still seeing insensitive and/or politically incorrect ad campaigns. It’s time we start diversifying the executive suite and the creative team. Each of the above examples could have been avoided had someone been around to raise their hand and call attention to the lack of insight that some of these campaigns display. Inauthenticity is obvious and easy to spot, especially in the digital age. According to AdWeek, the purchasing power of women in the U.S. alone ranges from $5 trillion to $15 trillion annually, and African American buying power was roughly $1.2 trillion in 2017. With those numbers, who wouldn’t want to target their products toward women and African Americans? However, if you’re going to target these groups, you have to do serious market research to study A) what gaps your product is filling for that community and B) what your target audience will respond favorably to and vice versa. Blind marketing will lead to pay raises for crisis PR teams time and again if brands aren’t strategic about how they target consumers (we just went through five examples of such). True inclusivity is more than adding minorities to the team. Bring us into the room and be open to learning our unique perspectives and experiences.
I learned in a Forbes article that, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, although women hold 72.8% of public relations (and fundraising) management jobs overall, only 10.7% of roles are held by those who are black, 3.1% by Asians, and 3.1% by Hispanics or Latinos. The article said marketing and sales managers share similar demographics, with blacks making up 6.7%, Asians 5.4%, and Hispanics and Latinos 9.7%. Women managers, overall, make up 47.6% of the industry. A lot of that comes from a lack of representation in the field, so that means there need to be additional efforts made to increase diversity in marketing and communications overall. Moving forward, be proactive in:
|
AuthorKelsey Haynes is a proven leader in marketing and communications who enjoys helping her clients get the most out of their brands Categories
All
Archives
March 2023
|